D-Sector for Development Community

   Friday, May 24, 2013
Agriculture - Duties and Rights - Education - Environment - Food - Global - Governance - Health - Indian Economy - Indian Society - Physical Development - Social Welfare - Water and Sanitation
Print | Back
When the will is weak
By Pandurang Hegde



Celebrating the World Environment Day is meaningless if political leadership does not back their words with actions. To save our precious natural resources, we need leaders with broader vision and commitment required to protect the environment. Unfortunately, the current lot lacks the vision and strength necessary to act decisively for the cause of Nature.


Forests are the first casualty of the development projects

The ruling UPA government has shown its true colours in recent months. The green signal by Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) to Posco as well as to build the untested nuclear power plants in Jaitapur clearly exposes the government’s determination to protect the corporate interests. Though, several conditions were put before giving the clearance, we know the irrelevance of such conditions which rarely get implemented. The exchange of black money may be huge but the destruction of the livelihood of thousands of tribals and ordinary people will be immeasurable.

The neo liberal policies followed since 1991 to achieve eight percent GDP growth have taken toll of our natural resources. The World Bank study concluded that the country lost almost four percent of the GDP as a result of environment destruction and related issues like, spread of water borne diseases due to pollution, and the rising number of diseases due to polluted air, and pesticide infected soil.

Despite these clear indicators of the disastrous impact of destroying the natural resources, why are our political leaders and bureaucrats keen on continuing the policies that lead to ecological poverty of people and the country?

An analysis of decision making process in regard to protection of natural resources in India indicates the need for strong leadership at the centre with a national perspective. The support of Indira Gandhi in 1980s to the Silent Valley struggle in Kerala to save Western Ghats, and Chipko movement in Himalayas was instrumental in halting the destructive developmental process in the initial stages.

The much debated and controversial Forest Conservation Act was passed during her regime in 1980 to halt the process of destruction of forests. This acted as a speed breaker to those state governments who were willing to sacrifice the forests at the altar of development.

The support of Indira Gandhi in 1980s to the Silent Valley struggle in Kerala to save Western Ghats, and Chipko movement in Himalayas was instrumental in halting the destructive developmental process in the initial stages.

Indira Gandhi ignored the political compulsions of short sighted policies that were detrimental to environment. She was able to put national interest before the parochial interest of regional leaders. However with the changing times, the evolving democratic set up in the neo liberal regime has failed to produce strong national leaders with broader vision and commitment required to protect the environment.

Contemporary democratic practices do not allow political parties to look beyond vested vote bank politics. Short term interests gets priority over national interests. For them the natural resources are like a bottomless pit to be used without any regards to its sustainability. Even the tribal leaders and farmers elected representatives start to collaborate with corporate power. Madhu Koda from Jharkhand is a living example of this case.

The high voltage national debate on Bt Brinjal is an excellent example of how the political parties derail the decision making process in favor of corporate interests. This strategy has paid handsome political dividends as it is hailed as one of pioneering attempts towards proactive informed decision making. What the people did not realise was that the politicians were playing a double game. Behind the doors, the government was quietly allowing field trials of numerous GM crops without any precautionary measures, deliberately contaminating our centres of diversity.

Like in the case of Bt cotton where the companies illegally released the seeds without permission, most of our crops are already contaminated by GM crops due to field trials. Under compulsion government has no other option but to give permission to GM crops.

The decision making process shows the lack of political will among the rulers as well as the bureaucracy to follow the existing laws to conserve the environment. Most of the parties have included environment protection in their manifesto; but it is rarely put into practice.

The political will to take on the corporate interests is limited to dialogues and debate, not challenging their motive to weaken the self reliance of farmers, and the power to destroy the natural systems, affecting the countryside for generations to come. The lawmakers who were supposed to protect the interests of the country blindly follow the orders of the totalitarian corporate institutions.

With the change of guard in Environment Ministry, the environment activists were happy to have a Minister who was talking their language. But the truth is something grotesque. The rate of approval to various projects is same as during the notorious Raja’s tenure. Recently, the Ministry gave permission to 40 mega projects in the wild life habitats in just three hours! And most of these are in total violation of the existing laws and rules.

The decision making process shows the lack of political will among the rulers as well as the bureaucracy to follow the existing laws to conserve the environment. Most of the parties have included environment protection in their manifesto; but it is rarely put into practice.

It is a national tragedy that almost all the political parties, both at national and regional levels are unanimous about one point agenda of ‘development’ that leads to destruction of the ecosystems that sustain our economies. In fact it is appropriation of these resources for the benefit of top 8 percent of the population in the country. It also shows the ideological bankruptcy of the parties, who are unable to provide an alternate path of development that benefits larger sections of the society.

Bolivia, a country equal to the size of Karnataka, has passed the Law of Mother Earth that grants nature the same rights and protection as humans. This was possible due to the strong political will of Evo Morales, the President. Even Bhutan, our tiny Himalayan neighbor has adopted the concept of Gross National Happiness, an innovative path towards development.

Why are we lagging behind? The need of hour is to take decisions in keeping the interest of future generations above all else. Will our political leaders show courage and willingness to conserve our natural resources for present and future generations?

 
Disclaimer:
The views expressed above are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views of d-sector editorial team.
 

Pandurang Hegde  |  appiko@gmail.com

Pandurang Hegde is a farmer, environmentalist and writer based in Sirsi town in Karnataka. He is well known for launching the Appiko movement which played a key role in protecting many forests from the axe in the Western Ghats region.

Write to the Author  |  Write to d-sector  |  Editor's Note
 


 Other Articles by Pandurang Hegde in
Environment Development  > Conservation > National Policies and Programmes

Rio+20: Listen to communities
Wednesday, June 20, 2012

We can not save the Mother Earth by allowing the corporate sector to take the lead in shaping the 'green economy'. The green policies must be based on the voices of communities, indigenous people and people's movements. But the question is whether the world leaders are willing to listen and pay heed to the wisdom of common people?

Green ministry or green signal?
Tuesday, June 05, 2012

During the last eight years of UPA rule, nation's precious natural capital has been exploited at an unprecedented scale on the pretext of ensuring faster economic growth. Now when the GDP growth rate is going downhill, who will compensate the permanent loss to environment for temporary gains?
 
 Other Articles in Environment Development
 
 
Coke Nation

The news that Indians consume far less aerated beverages each year than their neighbours in Pakistan and China could be interpreted differently. In comparison to per capita annual consumption of 39 and 21 bottles of aerated drinks in China and Pakistan respectively, average Indian drinks just about 14 bottles in a year. For Coca-Cola this means a serious job at hand for which the company has announced an advertisement budget of $5 billion. For the company, economic growth of a country and its peoples' thirst for aerated beverages is directly coorelated. 

Coca-Cola doesn't consider 'negative' publicity for cola behind poor consumption of the aerated beverage in India. As per its books, brand Coca-Cola has registered consecutive growth for past 27 quarters and has been a leader with a brand volume of 30 per cent. For Coca-Cola the target is to turn it into a 'Coke Nation', on the lines of Mexico where per capita annual consumption is 745 bottles..Whether Indian consumer exercises restraint in gulping the drink whose health consequences are all but known, the flipside to the story is that  the state governments are falling prey to Coca-Cola's investment plans?

Waste Appetite

The clock has turned full circle! After dumping industrial and toxic trash in the developing world all these years, Europe is now shopping for garbage to keep its cities, schools and homes heated. What better place than the developing world to shop for garbage! Reports indicate that northern Europe needs more than 700 million tons of trash to keep its waste-to-energy plants running. Most of its current demand is either domestically met or from garbage shipped from southern Europe.Yet, the demand is far more than what neighboring countries can spare after meeting their domestic needs. 

As more waste incinerators are being built in Sweden, Norway, Austria and Germany to meet the growing demand for heating public places, these countries are left with two options - either encourage households to produce more trash or else import garbage from across the world. For sure, it is easy to import than to produce! A company in England is already shipping some 1,000 tons of garbage to keep its systems running. Since incinerators have cornered environmental controversy in India and for rightful reasons, there exists an opportunity to explore feasibility of exporting as much as 109,589 tonnes of garbage that piles our streets on a daily basis. 

Lead View
To pee or not to pee
By Sudhirendar Sharma
21 Apr 2013

Sustained pollution of major rivers; continuous decline in groundwater reserves; priority allocation to non-consumptive sectors; and, growing disparity in water distribution only indicates that the worst is still to come!..
Book Shelf

Water Drops

Provocations for Development

River Dog

Psychology in the Bathroom
Commentators
Devinder Sharma
Carmen Miranda
Pandurang Hegde
Sudhirendar Sharma
Member Login
- New Member
- Forgot Password

Business Plan,Business Ideas,Advanced Energy,High Technology,Healthy Diets,Healthy Foods,Games Guides,Games Cheats,Export Business,US exports,Study Skills,Study Tips,Health Tips,Health Guides,Jewelry Stores,Jewellery UK Online