D-Sector for Development Community

   Thursday, June 20, 2013
Agriculture - Duties and Rights - Education - Environment - Food - Global - Governance - Health - Indian Economy - Indian Society - Physical Development - Social Welfare - Water and Sanitation
Print | Back
Study finds high mercury content in CFL bulbs
By d-sector Team



More than permissible presence of mercury in most brands of India made CFL bulbs has raised concerns about its impact on environment and health.

Most Indian middle-class families have switched to CFL bulbs due to the claims made that they are energy saving and have the potential of reducing approximately 40% energy demands globally. However, their energy saving character has diluted an equally important issue – the issue of mercury, an integral element of all CFLs and its end of life management needs to be addressed urgently.

A study by Toxics Link titled “Toxics In That Glow: Mercury in Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) in India” reveals the potential threat associated with these bulbs. The study, which analyzed twenty-two samples of CFLs of well-known brands sold in India for their mercury content, exposes a disturbing trend in mercury dosing practice by the manufacturers. The average mercury content per unit CFL has been found to be 21.21mg, much higher than the internationally known standards – ranging four to six times the CFL sold in many developed countries. Fifty percent of the samples analyzed were found to contain high average mercury content ranging between 12.24mg and 39.64mg across different wattages. The average mercury content in 5, 8, 11, 15 and 20 watts (across studied brands) samples are 22.2mg, 7.8mg (the least), 31.5mg 18.8mg and 17.7mg respectively.

In some cases the mercury content per watt has been found to be as high as 4.39mg. In most brands the mercury content was high in lower watt lamps, possibly to capture greater market share as mercury increases the lumen (light) output. It is also worrying to note that most multinational brands, having operations across the globe follow different regulatory norms in different countries including India, rather a dubious stand.

Mercury is a neurotoxin and highly toxic heavy metal known to impact vital organs such as lever and cause developmental and neurological problems; particularly dangerous to pregnant women and children. Some of their compounds are capable of crossing the placental barrier causing irreparable damage to the unborn / newborn babies.

Higher level of mercury dosing in CFLs enhances the chances of mercury contamination and toxicity. Used and discarded CFL(s) are usually dumped with general waste, thinning out mercury in the environment. Currently, with India having no management system or infrastructure in place to manage the used-up and/ or discarded CFLs, there is a high chance of mercury running into the waste stream and the food chain through these energy saving lamps, the study says. The report argues that this exposure pathway would greatly impact the health of waste workers and local inhabitant and equally affect the environment and wildlife.

Ravi Agarwal, Director of Toxics Link said, “The Indian CFL industry is exploiting the new market opened up by the climate change crisis; however they are creating a toxic crisis alongside. Instead of following the best practices in the world, they are putting the Indian consumer at risk through high level of mercury, even while the Government procrastinates on mandating a CFL collection and recycling system. Business interests are bypassing serious health concerns.”

Health and environmental concerns have prompted the governments across the globe to take measures in order to contain mercury dosing. In the US, lighting manufacturer members of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) have voluntarily capped the amount of mercury used in CFLs in 2007 and lowered the cap again in 2010. Currently the U.S cap is 4mg/ CFL for units up to 25 watts and 5mg/CFL for units over 25 watts. In EU, the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (ROHS) law mandates the cap to 5mg/CFL.

India presents a bleak scenario in the entire life cycle starting from mercury dosing to end of life management of mercury and CFLs. What adds to the grim reality is the fact that despite the potential dangers and serious health afflictions, the country lacks any regulatory framework to standardize and limit mercury dosing in India, which is quiet random. There is no infrastructure to deal with collection, recycling and disposal of used-up and discarded lamps.

This is despite the fact that India has a strong manufacturing base having potential to manufacture 400-500 million pieces annually. India also imports about 1/3rd CFL tubes.

The Toxics Link study recommends three-pronged action to contain the mercury menace through CFLs:

  • Standard: The government must set maximum mercury limit standard in CFL owing to the various health and environmental hazards. It is technically feasible to achieve 2-3 mg/CFLs in India, have the standards set accordingly. The standard should be made mandatory with effective monitoring strategy;
  • Consistent Practice: Since most multinational players in the organized sector have the means to move towards safer regimes, they should standardize their production process as followed by them in other parts of the world;
  • End-of-life management: The end-of-life management must be the joint responsibility of the manufacturers, regulatory agencies and the executive bodies. Consumers, too, have a responsibility for the proper disposal of broken and used-up lamps. For recycling, the best-suited technology must be decided based on a collective dialogue among various stakeholders.

Write to d-sector  |  Editor's Note
 


 Other Articles by d-sector Team in
Environment Development  > Risks and Hazards > Chemicals and Toxins
 
 Other Articles in Environment Development
 
 
Free Will

Many feel that all hullabaloo on corruption may not rattle the business-as-usual scenario! A peep into the latest developments with the controversial scheme for elected parliamentarians may confirm such apprehension. Each MP has Rs 5 crore each year at his/her discretion for promoting 'local area development'. Whatever it may mean, the privileged members can now assign works under MPLADS scheme without calling tenders and they have liberty to engage any agency or assign the task to any NGO.The only clause being that the assigned party should fit into the subjective interpretation of being of 'national reputation' .
 
That the scheme is under Comptroller & Auditor General's scanner for 'irregularities' doesn't concern the government a bit. Far from taking cognizance of irregularities pointed out by CAG, the Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation has gone to the extent of suggesting that MPLADS funds can henceforth be used for works on 'private lands'. With an estimated Rs 21,300 crore riding on members in each session of the parliament under the scheme, the chance for public money to be squandered for private purposes cannot be ruled out. There is enough evidence to suggest that 'that' might indeed be the case!

Water Ignorance

No denying that each drop of water must be conserved. In this light, 92.7 Big FM ongoing campaign on water conservation deserves appreciation. Using multiple celebrity voices, the 'paani bachao life banao' campaign has been pitched around plugging leakages and saving wastages. Targeted primarily at urban listeners, bulk of the messages relate to saving basin wastage, plumbing leaking cistern and restricting car washing. While the 'frequency modulation' medium is being effectively used to spread crucial message, it erroneusly assumes that 'indivuals' have been the cause of the crises. In reality, individuals have little role in the big water crises.   

The question that must be asked is: does water saved get reallocated to those who deserve it more? Ironically, the distribution system has no such provision and whatever little is saved gets sucked within the inefficient system itself. Afterall, municipal consumption is less than 10 per cent of the total water consumed across diverse sectors. For the big picture change, focus needs to shift from acts of personal consumption to gross failure of the system that controls and delivers water. Any campaign taking consumers on a guilt trip by engaging them in what-you-can-do-to-save-the-earth guilt trip is surely misdirected! 

Lead View
Food diversity can fight hunger
By Pandurang Hegde
22 May 2013

Living democracies where farmers make their own decision on what to grow and eat leads to eradication of hunger. It enhances the dignity and confidence of local communities, and teaches them ..
Book Shelf

An India for Everyone

Wave

Winner Take All

Water Drops
Commentators
Devinder Sharma
Carmen Miranda
Pandurang Hegde
Sudhirendar Sharma
Member Login
- New Member
- Forgot Password