D-Sector for Development Community

   Thursday, May 23, 2013
Agriculture - Duties and Rights - Education - Environment - Food - Global - Governance - Health - Indian Economy - Indian Society - Physical Development - Social Welfare - Water and Sanitation
Print | Back
Development governance in Least Developed Countries


The global crisis has undermined the factors that enabled strong GDP growth performance in LDCs in 2002-2008, exposing once again both the lingering structural weaknesses of their economies, and the myth of self-regulating markets.

The shortcomings of the current development paradigm need to be addressed. A rebalancing between the State and the market is necessary to create resilience to external shocks through greater diversification and structural change, and to promote a more inclusive and employment-intensive growth path. LDCs need to build new developmental States that seriously attempt to deploy their administrative and political resources to the task of economic development. LDCs need to find new forms of development governance that are appropriate for the twenty-first century.

From a macroeconomic point of view, the key challenge for LDCs is to mobilize the much-needed financial resources. Public investment should be undertaken to close the infrastructure gap and "crowd in" private funds for faster capital accumulation. Monetary policy should sustain such a pro-investment macroeconomic framework, instead of focusing on tight inflation targeting and thereby hampering long-term investment. Active exchange rate and capital flow policies should also support the expansion of productive capacities, by reducing exchange rate volatility and preventing capital flight. LDCs also need to strengthen domestic financial institutions, recognizing their important role in supporting private investment and mobilizing savings.

LDCs are currently in a vicious circle of deficient food production, subsistence agriculture, low levels of productivity, declining investment, increasing scarcity of land and water, and rising rates of urbanization. LDCs should give much greater priority in government policy to agriculture. They should boost agricultural investment, fostering the uptake of new technology, developing infrastructure (e.g. roads, warehouses and wholesale facilities), and improving access to credit, particularly for small-scale and medium-scale farmers. Governments also need to take measures that favour access for small-scale farmers to improved inputs, that support agricultural research and development, and that spread knowledge about effective farming and farm management.

Despite their recent strong growth performance, few LDCs have managed to spur structural change and pursue a sustainable diversification of their economies, while many have actually experienced de-industrialization. Improvements in the economic performance of LDCs will require effective industrial policy that includes public investment and strategic coordination of private actors. Simultaneous efforts to raise investment levels, build new economic links, and upgrade technological capacity - which is at the heart of industrial growth - are the surest ways of promoting diversification and economic growth in LDCs.

For details:
http://www.unctad.org/Templates/Download.asp?docid=11721&lang=1&intItemID=1397

Write to d-sector  |  Editor's Note
 


 Other Articles by d-sector Team in
Learning  > Publications And Reviews

Global life expectancy on the rise: WHO
Monday, May 16, 2011


Addressing violence against women and girls in sexual and reproductive health services
Thursday, August 26, 2010


Climate cash must not increase developing countries' debt
Tuesday, June 01, 2010


Deforestation dips but all's still not well
Tuesday, March 30, 2010

  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15     
 
 
Coke Nation

The news that Indians consume far less aerated beverages each year than their neighbours in Pakistan and China could be interpreted differently. In comparison to per capita annual consumption of 39 and 21 bottles of aerated drinks in China and Pakistan respectively, average Indian drinks just about 14 bottles in a year. For Coca-Cola this means a serious job at hand for which the company has announced an advertisement budget of $5 billion. For the company, economic growth of a country and its peoples' thirst for aerated beverages is directly coorelated. 

Coca-Cola doesn't consider 'negative' publicity for cola behind poor consumption of the aerated beverage in India. As per its books, brand Coca-Cola has registered consecutive growth for past 27 quarters and has been a leader with a brand volume of 30 per cent. For Coca-Cola the target is to turn it into a 'Coke Nation', on the lines of Mexico where per capita annual consumption is 745 bottles..Whether Indian consumer exercises restraint in gulping the drink whose health consequences are all but known, the flipside to the story is that  the state governments are falling prey to Coca-Cola's investment plans?

Waste Appetite

The clock has turned full circle! After dumping industrial and toxic trash in the developing world all these years, Europe is now shopping for garbage to keep its cities, schools and homes heated. What better place than the developing world to shop for garbage! Reports indicate that northern Europe needs more than 700 million tons of trash to keep its waste-to-energy plants running. Most of its current demand is either domestically met or from garbage shipped from southern Europe.Yet, the demand is far more than what neighboring countries can spare after meeting their domestic needs. 

As more waste incinerators are being built in Sweden, Norway, Austria and Germany to meet the growing demand for heating public places, these countries are left with two options - either encourage households to produce more trash or else import garbage from across the world. For sure, it is easy to import than to produce! A company in England is already shipping some 1,000 tons of garbage to keep its systems running. Since incinerators have cornered environmental controversy in India and for rightful reasons, there exists an opportunity to explore feasibility of exporting as much as 109,589 tonnes of garbage that piles our streets on a daily basis. 

Lead View
To pee or not to pee
By Sudhirendar Sharma
21 Apr 2013

Sustained pollution of major rivers; continuous decline in groundwater reserves; priority allocation to non-consumptive sectors; and, growing disparity in water distribution only indicates that the worst is still to come!..
Book Shelf

Water Drops

Provocations for Development

River Dog

Psychology in the Bathroom
Commentators
Devinder Sharma
Carmen Miranda
Pandurang Hegde
Sudhirendar Sharma
Member Login
- New Member
- Forgot Password

Business Plan,Business Ideas,Advanced Energy,High Technology,Healthy Diets,Healthy Foods,Games Guides,Games Cheats,Export Business,US exports,Study Skills,Study Tips,Health Tips,Health Guides,Jewelry Stores,Jewellery UK Online