D-Sector for Development Community

   Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Agriculture - Duties and Rights - Education - Environment - Food - Global - Governance - Health - Indian Economy - Indian Society - Physical Development - Social Welfare - Water and Sanitation
Print | Back
Kerala Govt proposal to cull protected birds
By d-sector Team



Integrated District Development Plan (IDDP) for Kollam proposes the culling of fish-eating birds Little Cormorant in the district to save fish in the freshwaters.


Little Cormorant (photo courtesy: wikipedia)

A Kerala government scheme that proposes the culling of fish-eating birds Little Cormorant (Phalacrocorax niger) in Kollam district as "the birds prey on fish and deplete the wealth of inland water bodies" has both horrified and surprised the environmental activists and organizations. The proposal is despite these birds being protected under the Wildlife Protection Act.

The scheme, under the Integrated District Development Plan (IDDP) for Kollam, will be implemented during 2009-10 by the State Fisheries Department in coordination with the Forest Department and local self-government institutions.       The IDDP scheme report states that these fish-eating birds are a major cause for the depletion of fish wealth in inland water bodies.

The IDDP scheme report states that these fish-eating birds are a major cause for the depletion of fish wealth in inland water bodies. Fishermen depending on inland water fishing for their livelihood have expressed concern over this for long.

The report avers that the time has come for controlling the little cormorant population. The birds are gregarious in nature and are voracious fish-eaters, the report says. "Anyone observing the birds in inland water bodies will certainly endorse the concern of the fishermen", mentions the government report.


Little Cormorant (Phalacrocorax niger) - photo courtesy: birding.in

The report highlights that the population of these birds in the Kollam district at present is 1,00,000 and the plan is to cull 70 per cent of these birds. With an outlay of Rs 4 lakh, the scheme has devised an incentive of Rs 5 a bird to the trained person who guns down the bird with an air gun.

The news, meanwhile, has left the environmentalists furious. While some like K.K. Sivakumar, State Education Officer of the World Wildlife Fund, have rubbished the scheme as "foolish and a violation of the law," others like the environmental activist N Ravi are confident that the Forest Department would reject the scheme.

Sivakumar said since the birds are covered by the Wildlife Protection Act it is the duty of the government to protect them. Inland water bodies are the natural habitat of the birds. If they are a threat to fish farms, the owners can only strive to keep the birds at bay. They cannot be eliminated, he added.

He reiterated that the scheme would be opposed and the WWF would create awareness against it if the Kerala government decided to go ahead with it.

The scheme has been mentioned on page number 57 of the IDDP executive plan, released by Finance Minister T.M. Thomas Isaac.       The Animal Welfare Board of India plans to move the court if the scheme is implemented. A.G. Babu, member of the board, said little cormorants came under Schedule IV of the Wildlife Protection Act and could not be killed.

The Animal Welfare Board of India plans to move the court if the scheme is implemented. A.G. Babu, member of the board, said that the scheme challenged the law of the land. Little cormorants came under Schedule IV of the Wildlife Protection Act and could not be killed.

P.O. Nameer, State coordinator of Asian Waterfowl Census, said the scheme could not be implemented since it was against the law. Besides, his organisation had been regularly taking the census of water birds in the state for the past 10 years. According to its data, the little cormorant population in the state had never crossed 10,000 i.e. one-tenth of what is claimed in the report. In fact, in the whole of Asia, the population was nearly 2.8 lakh, he said.

Write to d-sector  |  Editor's Note
 


 Other Articles by d-sector Team in
Environment Development  > Natural Resources > Flora and Fauna
 
 Other Articles in Environment Development
 
 
Coke Nation

The news that Indians consume far less aerated beverages each year than their neighbours in Pakistan and China could be interpreted differently. In comparison to per capita annual consumption of 39 and 21 bottles of aerated drinks in China and Pakistan respectively, average Indian drinks just about 14 bottles in a year. For Coca-Cola this means a serious job at hand for which the company has announced an advertisement budget of $5 billion. For the company, economic growth of a country and its peoples' thirst for aerated beverages is directly coorelated. 

Coca-Cola doesn't consider 'negative' publicity for cola behind poor consumption of the aerated beverage in India. As per its books, brand Coca-Cola has registered consecutive growth for past 27 quarters and has been a leader with a brand volume of 30 per cent. For Coca-Cola the target is to turn it into a 'Coke Nation', on the lines of Mexico where per capita annual consumption is 745 bottles..Whether Indian consumer exercises restraint in gulping the drink whose health consequences are all but known, the flipside to the story is that  the state governments are falling prey to Coca-Cola's investment plans?

Waste Appetite

The clock has turned full circle! After dumping industrial and toxic trash in the developing world all these years, Europe is now shopping for garbage to keep its cities, schools and homes heated. What better place than the developing world to shop for garbage! Reports indicate that northern Europe needs more than 700 million tons of trash to keep its waste-to-energy plants running. Most of its current demand is either domestically met or from garbage shipped from southern Europe.Yet, the demand is far more than what neighboring countries can spare after meeting their domestic needs. 

As more waste incinerators are being built in Sweden, Norway, Austria and Germany to meet the growing demand for heating public places, these countries are left with two options - either encourage households to produce more trash or else import garbage from across the world. For sure, it is easy to import than to produce! A company in England is already shipping some 1,000 tons of garbage to keep its systems running. Since incinerators have cornered environmental controversy in India and for rightful reasons, there exists an opportunity to explore feasibility of exporting as much as 109,589 tonnes of garbage that piles our streets on a daily basis. 

Lead View
To pee or not to pee
By Sudhirendar Sharma
21 Apr 2013

Sustained pollution of major rivers; continuous decline in groundwater reserves; priority allocation to non-consumptive sectors; and, growing disparity in water distribution only indicates that the worst is still to come!..
Book Shelf

Water Drops

Provocations for Development

River Dog

Psychology in the Bathroom
Commentators
Devinder Sharma
Carmen Miranda
Pandurang Hegde
Sudhirendar Sharma
Member Login
- New Member
- Forgot Password

Business Plan,Business Ideas,Advanced Energy,High Technology,Healthy Diets,Healthy Foods,Games Guides,Games Cheats,Export Business,US exports,Study Skills,Study Tips,Health Tips,Health Guides,Jewelry Stores,Jewellery UK Online